- 5.94 inches in length
- 4.13 inches in height
- .94 inches is width
- 3.1 inch barrel
- 13.4 ounces in weight
- 6+1 round capacity
If this is correct, rather than an internet hoax or disinformation from Glock, it is a curious choice. I know of no one that was asking for Glock to produce a single stack .380 but a lot of people who were asking for a single stack model 19 or slightly smaller pistol.
If the .380 ACP is their choice then the size and capacity of the model 92 are not at all remarkable. Let's compare it with other pocket pistols:
Glock 42
|
Kahr
|
Taurus 738
|
Kel-Tec PF9
|
Kimber Solo
|
Taurus 709
|
|
Caliber
|
.380 ACP
|
.380 ACP
|
.380 ACP
|
9mm
|
9mm
|
9mm
|
Length
|
5.94”
|
4.9”
|
5.25”
|
5.85”
|
5.5”
|
6”
|
Height
|
4.13”
|
3.9”
|
3.25”
|
4.3”
|
3.9”
|
|
Width
|
.94”
|
.75”
|
.80”
|
.88”
|
1.2”
|
.92”
|
Barrel
|
3.1”
|
2.53”
|
2.84”
|
3.1”
|
2.7”
|
3”
|
Weight
|
13.4 oz
|
10 oz
|
10.2 oz
|
12.7 oz
|
17 oz
|
19 oz
|
Capacity
|
6 + 1
|
6 + 1
|
6 + 1
|
7 +1
|
6 +1
|
7 + 1
|
As you can see, there are 9mm pocket pistols the same size or smaller. It is about the size of the Kel-Tec PF9 that holds 7 rounds of 9mm as opposed to the six round magazine capacity of the Glock 42.
Just doesn't seem to make sense to me.
